Price Of Lakme Eye Shadow

Should we cease to work for one to be listened C2RMF?

Scholl's In Singapore

Heads roll ... They lied to

With the departure of No. 1 and No. 2 C2RMF as of June 1, 2010 and the absence of Mrs. Labourdette (Head Service des Musées de France) went on vacation in La Baule without finding successors to the leadership of C2RMF. (Its director Mr Bélaval not fail to praise).

Belphegor offers self on the first floor of Flora to remember the good times he has past with his former comrades Committee Public Hi: Robespierre, Saint-Just, Danton, Barrere, Couthon ... ..

PS: If you know a former minister who became ASSEDIC repress the palace of Versailles, Belphegor may wish to consider his application for the Louvre website.

AH AH AH AH AH ... ... ... ...

Optimum Nutrition Store Singapore

Cergy

CNRS away will, thus supporting the total absence of a scientific project in the project report of the new reserve center written by the duo of the Louvre (and gentlemen Barbaret Pomarède).

In one year, CNRS him create a new chemistry laboratory section for heritage materials on the site of Paris 6.

Consequently Cergy-Pontoise, which the Louvre had promised a research laboratory of an exceptional standard, has rolled .

Ap Bio Carolina Lab 5

Who wishes to turn the C2RMF and its agents? The flight into Egypt

Is it not indecent, in full economic crisis, choosing to squander more than 40 million euros of public money? How does one explain this situation while the budgets of the public are falling and there is already a center that works?

Our management has always complained about the rumors. But given the lack of information, it can not prevent personal thinking the worst. For more than a month, she has the report of Mr. Pomarède. However, she still refused to connect to all staff. Consequently, according to the departments and branches, this report circulates among the staff or not. This is intolerable. And it certainly will not in the sense of unity of the service proclaimed.

In his report, he presents the future Pomarède reserve center in Cergy-Pontoise, renamed for the occasion, Centre Study, Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage (CECRP). This is a set of positions of principle, devoid of any factual data, and empty phrases. Mr. Pomarède poses the problem of searching, a new way: you're great, but we need you and such a structure? From the beginning of the file, direction C2RMF had decided to bow to the direction of the Louvre.

The Louvre wants to keep labs and shops nearby and only for his own needs. At the same time, the Rapporteur advocates the unification of the structure of foreshadowing CECRP the Louvre. (What about the Super Branch heritage?). Thus, the Louvre would have the upper hand in the conservation policy, restoration and research concerning the assets in France. The goal is laudable, concentrating its actions, missions and research to the CECRP works themselves. Permitting them to hear that the works are currently neglected. It must be said that the rapporteur, the most serious argument for keeping the research activities at the Louvre would be a question of money, because obviously the interest of scientists for a program is proportional to the funding they can withdraw.

The fact that the science programs are the result of collaboration between curators and research staff and seek first and foremost to answer scientific questions clearly identified do not appear to touch the rapporteur. This explains why he refuses to give his opinion on the future of UMR171 and AGLAE. It is clear that our last reporter does not know what that brings and UMR171 or what serves AGLAE. It's not his fault.

Having never had the opportunity to work with C2RMF, he is reduced to read and compile reports that it delivers our direction. It is no coincidence that the most detailed is dedicated to the department documentation. If you are seen by our direction you will be well placed ... CECRP What methods!

We have repeatedly called for a genuine debate on policy research and restoration of works of art. It Within this framework, Tuesday, May 11, CGT-Culture and SNTRS (CGT Research) met to develop a joint work plan report on the consequences of Vincent Pomarède and more generally on the role of industry and research personnel within the Ministry of Culture. Let us not forget that at the industry research waltzed between the paper trail or conservation. For now, this issue is put aside but it requires RGPP return to the agenda once the C2RMF will burst.

For years, the research sector is being undermined in the Ministry of Culture, the RGPP does not help. How the file is processed CERCP involved in this decay of the research sector. Pushing researchers C2RMF Culture and CNRS "to the door, they want our leaders to clear themselves of the predicted failure of CERCP? This attitude is irresponsible. We encourage all our colleagues to continue to work and set up projects, and especially not to concede defeat. We will fight to maintain CNRS UMR171 and through the development of research on the restoration and conservation. We shared a lot with the head of the research department. Also we have had discussions and meetings with officials valuable research and restoration and conservation because we had to find other contacts from the time when our leadership does not see fit to receive us, even to understand what the concerns of its agents. We took it publicly.

Already, a delegation consisting of union representatives from the CNRS and the MCC had an audience with the Director of the CNRS UMR 171. Following that, the delegation asked to meet gentlemen Bélaval and desalination, and the Minister's office.

The bitterness is so great that many of colleagues have informed us that they will boycott the May 26 meeting and ask us to be attached to this position.

Next week we will hold a general meeting to determine ways to implement this tool, to save, set the follow-up to the petition BELPHEGOR and finally what attitude should we adopt if the month of July if the UMR 171 and the chemistry section does not continue to work C2RMF from 2011. Source

CGT-Culture

Lens Front Element Replacement

Nicolas Poussin (painted in 1657 or 1658)

Joseph You're right, it's time to go
To save our children and our last smiles

Look! My hands are shaking and my heart speeds up!
Listen! She comes to us! The terrible wrath! It
Herod! The fool! It kills friends and brothers!
It destroys our houses, our crops, our dreams!

This chaos in the dark, is the powerful punch that hits
without hearing the cry of innocent

Flee! Flee! We can no longer
nothing
Flee! Flee friend!
It is no longer our land

Our people hope that we escape,
That one day we will arise an army of boys
To carry our words and they will defend us!
even stronger then, could we return?

You are right, for now, it's time to go
Silently, softly, on tiptoe ...

Tell Me, You, to whom the angel spoke, Where
we find refuge?
Where will we be loved?

Poem by SL

Fucibet Cream After Warts Removal

IIC (International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works) joins international protest relocation of C2RMF

Attached is the letter of protest sent to several Personalities of conservation and restoration of French.
particular to Mr Philippe Belaval, CEO of Heritage, Ministry of Culture & Communication.


Dear Mr. Belaval,

The CII would like to express its deep concern over the proposed relocation of the Centre for Research and Restoration of Museums of France (C2RMF). While aware that the Louvre must continually optimize its space to take its missions, we must recognize the essential contribution of more than 1200 C2RMF museum collections throughout France.

The importance of the Center's location in a large metropolis serving as a hub for transportation and academic research and technology, should not be underestimated. The advantages of a direct link with the Louvre C2RMF are many and benefit the Louvre itself, giving it a leading position in the field of preservation and scientific heritage. The IIC also draws attention to the fact that breaking this link caused by the move will have on the long-term negative impact on the many different museums and institutions of France and the entire international community benefits from the work of the Centre.

C2RMF The importance of the international community must be emphasized. His contributions were significant and essential for a rational and successful preservation of cultural heritage. The Centre's work clearly reflects the interest and commitment of France to the preservation of heritage, not only nationally but also globally.

We hope that you will reconsider the proposed removal and will maintain facilities C2RMF the heart of this important urban center in one of the largest museums in the world, the Louvre.

Very respectfully yours, Jerry Podany

CII President

Jo Kirby Atkinson
CII Secretary-General

-------------------- ----------------------------- ------------------- VERSION FRANCAISE -------

CII has joined The International Protest At The Proposed Relocation of the Centre for Research and Restoration of Museums of France (C2RMF). A Copy Of The letter of protest, feels to a number of heritage conservation and senior figures in France follows:
Monsieur Philippe BELAVAL, Directeur Général des Patrimoines, Ministère de la Culture & de la Communication

Dear M. Belaval

The IIC would like to express its deep concern regarding the possible relocation of the Centre de Recherche et de Restauration des Musées de France (C2RMF). While we are keenly aware that the Louvre Museum must continually seek the efficient use of its space to meet its mission, the value of the C2RMF to more than 1200 collections across France is clear.

The importance of the Centre’s location in a major city, serving as a transportation, scholarly and technical research hub for much of Europe, cannot be overstated. The advantages of the close association of the Centre with the Louvre (administratively and through its location) are many and reflect well upon the Louvre itself, promoting the Louvre’s position as a leader in the field of heritage preservation and scientific research. IIC also points out that the disruption caused by this relocation will have a long term negative impact upon the many museums and institutions across France that depend upon the Centre’s work and the international community which benefits from C2RMF’s work

The importance of C2RMF to the international community cannot be over emphasized. Its contributions have been monumental and essential to the logical and successful preservation of cultural heritage. The Centre’s work reflects positively on the interest and commitment of France to heritage preservation not just within the country, but globally.

We hope you will reconsider this relocation and support the Centre’s facilities within an important urban centre and within one of the world’s great museums, the Louvre.

Yours respectfully,

Jerry Podany
IIC President

Jo Kirby Atkinson
IIC Secretary-General