Sample Volunteer Hours Letter

0108 TGI OF THE JUDGE PHILIPPE MICHEL CRETEIL VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION OF JACQUELINE









Jean Bon SAINT ANDRE Chairman of the Anti Corruption Court of First Instance Créteil, new scandal Judge Philippe MICHEL ruled August 26, 2010 in a case in which a priority issue of constitutionality was filed at the hearing on August 20, 2010.
J. Philippe MICHEL deliberately violated the Constitution and the rights of the defense at the expense of Ms. Yvette Michaud is considered part of "Under men."
If filing a priority issue of constitutionality, the court has an obligation to refer the hearing to the submissions of the Public Ministry (Attorney).
In this case, Judge Philippe MICHEL initially ruled on the merits (subject to demand) August 26, 2010 indicating the return to constitutionality issue at the hearing on December 10, 2010 in a proceeding or This question was not asked.
This is a very great scandal, to the extent that Judge Philippe MICHEL has violated the rules of procedures and also violated the rule of "separation of powers," Judge Philippe MICHEL thinks above the laws passed by Parliament.
A complaint will be filed with the Superior Council of Magistracy cons Judge Philippe MICHEL for forfeiture to the extent, obviously, he considers Ms. Yvette MICHAUD as part of the category "Under Men," with no legal claims.
Moreover, Judge Philippe MICHEL ruled August 26, 2010 although he had been challenged at the hearing on August 20, 2010 by Ms Yvette Michaud.
Indeed, Article 346 of the Code of Civil Procedure establishes the principle that a judge shall no longer take any decision in the case in which he was disqualified.

When a judge is disqualified, he can not take any decision in the matter or has been challenged, Gold, J. Philippe MICHEL, although duly objected to the hearing on August 20, 2010, by filing a document bearing his name, was in violation of the law, issued a ruling August 26, 2010 in this case. J. Philippe MICHEL is a Magistrate who think above the law and in this case committed an aggravated violation of the rule of "separation of powers."

Parliament passes laws to be applied by judges.

In this case, we find that Judge Philippe MICHEL Tribunal de Grande Instance of Creteil refuses to apply the current laws, and thereby grants rights to pass each other.