Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Sharking What Does It Mean
UNIONS OF JUDGES WILL THEY HAVE THE AUDACITY TO SHOUT TO DICTATORSHIP ???????
COIGNARD By Jacqueline Renaud LECADRE
- DAILY: Wednesday, July 5, 2006 - 06:00
- is historic. A magistrate will have to pay his own money damages awarded in proceedings finding a failure of the public service of justice. Never before has the French government had made this play device provided in the texts under a name a bit barbaric, "action for recovery,"
which allows him to turn against one of its officers and to presenting all or part of the bill.
A Judicial Peter Chanel, former chairman of the tribunal Nice
Potchou As for the LLC, she decided to sue the State for "excessive hours of deliberation."
Stopping the State Council fell on January 25: State must pay 57,000 euros for conservators to compensate them for pain and suffering. For the material, we will see later: restaurateurs who have used the famous trial of late December 2004 (which gave them wrong), the State Council is awaiting the decision of the administrative court of Marseille to rule on this point. But immediately, the Vice-President of the Council of State, Renaud Denoix de Saint Marc, has initiated action for recovery Peter Chanel cons. He claimed a quarter of the damages, or 13,500 euros. Why fourth? Perhaps therefore considers that the wrongs we have shared. The State Council has always known how stocks work in progress, by jurisdiction and judge. Why has he not responded before? An inspection team to monitor what happens in the courts and the administrative tribunal of Nice has been controlled in recent years. Controllers have they seen anything or say anything? The decision to charge a magistrate is historical but also significant, as the individual responsibility of administrative judges or judicial has become a sensitive issue. More than ever in fashion since Outreau, it will be addressed in a new reform bill prepared at the Chancery. Unions judges expect to see this text. The weapon in the foot.
Stopping the State Council fell on January 25: State must pay 57,000 euros for conservators to compensate them for pain and suffering. For the material, we will see later: restaurateurs who have used the famous trial of late December 2004 (which gave them wrong), the State Council is awaiting the decision of the administrative court of Marseille to rule on this point. But immediately, the Vice-President of the Council of State, Renaud Denoix de Saint Marc, has initiated action for recovery Peter Chanel cons. He claimed a quarter of the damages, or 13,500 euros. Why fourth? Perhaps therefore considers that the wrongs we have shared. The State Council has always known how stocks work in progress, by jurisdiction and judge. Why has he not responded before? An inspection team to monitor what happens in the courts and the administrative tribunal of Nice has been controlled in recent years. Controllers have they seen anything or say anything? The decision to charge a magistrate is historical but also significant, as the individual responsibility of administrative judges or judicial has become a sensitive issue. More than ever in fashion since Outreau, it will be addressed in a new reform bill prepared at the Chancery. Unions judges expect to see this text. The weapon in the foot.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment