Thursday, July 8, 2010

Can You Keep A Platypus As A Pet?

Apprentices destroyers!

On 1 July, our former director was in his former office. Likely to welcome the new director. Use in good way or finish the job? Criminals always return to the scene of the crime! We wanted to trust Ms. Naffah. After five years, it is clear that the result is catastrophic, unmotivated staff, the service ... manhandled.
Nobody knows what you do and what our missions, and cherry on the cake, everyone takes care of us without contact us. At every official report, we propose to develop what already exists here. It explains the learnedly he must meet an art historian, the conservator and scientist around the work, sometimes we're fools for not having practiced for years. They seem to make great discoveries and we must follow in Cergy to see the miracle happen. Except that these are not miracles, but the methods developed by Daily agents and C2RMF LRMH. This misunderstanding of the role of LRMH of C2RMF and their concrete contribution to the knowledge of wealth proves that, despite their claims, some curators and senior officials of the ministry contrefichent much work we do.
In its engagement letter dated 21 June 2010, the Minister of Culture encourages the Director of the INP to develop doctoral programs and for curators restorers in cooperation with the Ministry of Higher Education. However, weakening the research within the C2RMF, the department denies the expertise in research training, that could bring C2RMF in the field of restoration and conservation.
Having tried to impose their approach to all stakeholders and the Department of the CNRS, the Museum Service and the administration of the Louvre are the responsibility of starting CNRS. They claim to have the support of policies, while trade-offs do not
are all rendered. The silence of policies is linked to ignorance of the file.
Is this irony than to observe that Mr. Loyrette itself as "the principal payer and designated pilot [of the site reserves]" in Liberation, three days after weeping misery in the world?
We know that will close the CNRS UMR 171 31 December 2011 and create a new unit of Heritage Research in Paris-VI. Led by a Philippe Walter never listened to by the leadership of the department nor the museum director of the Louvre, but with a considerable weight at the CNRS and the Ministry of Research, this new unit will soon overshadow at C2RMF, especially if it ends up cutting the Louvre in Cergy. They must admit that if no agent culture does go in Cergy, their project was stillborn. The CMC will have trouble convincing the CNRS to invest in the two parallel structures knowing that the current trend is to budget cuts. This situation can only be detrimental to the heritage research
and lead an unhealthy climate full of mistrust. Moreover, it appears that the project be delayed Cergy two years in these times of budgetary sacrifices. The result: a weakened C2RMF, a departure from the CNRS document to December 31, 2011, a loss of resources and specialists ... What a mess!
We must develop another strategy with the new direction. We have no choice. We're not out of the woods. The new director of C2RMF has not yet made his position but it participates, already, in the capacity, the working group of the CMC, the CNRS, and LRMH C2RMF not forget Mrs. Labourdette, Vice President University of Cergy, and of course the Louvre. This working group met again yesterday in discreetly.
The decision to move, imposed by the Director of Museums of France and Mr. Loyerette, was supported by the former director of C2RMF in serat it the same with the new director?
In the current climate, positioning clear and quick on his part is necessary. No sooner had his appointment, we requested a meeting at the DGP office, SMF, the Louvre to discuss the future of C2RMF in the presence of the new guideline. To prepare for this meeting, colleagues should tell us their feelings on key issues:

- What are our concrete contribution to policy research, restoration and conservation of heritage?
- What is our appreciation for the history of art and the general public?
- What are the benefits of the current location of C2RMF?
- What CNRS brings to our work and our expertise?
- And of course other issues specific to your business ...


To go further, this argument should lead to the creation of a manifesto that we will release that officers C2RMF present their visions and missions on their trades .

CGT-Culture C2RMF, July 7, 2010

0 comments:

Post a Comment